PRACTICE AREAS PERSONAL INJURY
 

The personal injury lawyers at Flynn, Gaskins & Bennett have extensive experience representing people who have been injured through the carelessness, negligence, or irresponsible behavior of another individual or entity. Through the years, we have developed a reputation as a firm that will fight for our clients and their cases all the way to trial if necessary. We strive to provide aggressive and effective representation for our clients, regardless of the size or complexity of the case. We have handled many large, complex cases involving motor vehicle accidents, over-the-road truck accidents, wrongful death, premises liability, assault, dram shop, and many other issues.

SELECTED RESULTS*

Taylor v. Minneapolis Golf Club (2008), Hennepin County District Court, Minnesota
Total Settlement:  $8+ Million
Wrongful death of a six-year old girl who was eviscerated in the kiddie pool at the Minneapolis Golf Club.
Dalglish v. Keener (2003), Superior Court of Carroll County, Georgia
Total Verdict: $4.5 million
30-year old woman profoundly injured in multi-vehicle accident.

J.A. v. B.B.R. (1996), Steele County District Court, Minnesota
Total Settlement: $3.45 million
Wrongful death/personal injury; commercial truck and automobile collision.

Forster & D’Heilly v. S.O.D. (1990), Hennepin County District Court, Minnesota
Total Settlement: $2.5 million
Two injured in outdoor advertising sign collapse.

Posthumus v. Brey, et al. (2004), Freeborn County District Court, Minnesota
Partial Settlement: $1.5 million
Two injured in motor vehicle collision.

Carlson v. Century Indemnity, et al. (1998), Carver County District Court, Minnesota and U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota
see Century Indemnity Co. v. Carlson, 133 F.2d 591, (8th Cir. 1998)
Total Settlement: $1.2 million wrongful death caused by commercial truck and automobile collision found to be in interstate commerce.

*Past results are reported to provide the reader with an indication of the types of matters we handle and do not and should not be construed to create an expectation of result in any other situation, as all legal matters are dependent upon their own unique fact situation and applicable law.