The Minnesota Court of Appeals reversed the district court's denial of the Metropolitan Airport Commission's motion for summary judgment. In granting dismissal to the MAC, the court of appeals held the mere slipperiness doctrine was applicable to the facts of the case because plaintiff could not establish the parking ramp where she fell was operated by the MAC for profit. Moreover, the court of appeals held the "artificial condition" exception to the application of the mere slipperiness doctrine did not apply because the slope of a parking surface is not an artifical condition within the scope of the exception.